Article 319 of the Penal Code (Law 599 of 2000), as amended by Article 4 of Law 1762 of 2015, defines smuggling: bringing goods into or taking them out of the country through non-authorized places in an amount above 50 SMMLV (monthly legal minimum wages), with 4 to 8 years in prison and a fine of 200% to 300% of the customs value. The same penalty applies to whoever conceals, disguises or removes from customs control and intervention goods worth more than 50 SMMLV, or brings them into the primary zone without the legal formalities. If the amount exceeds 200 SMMLV, the prison term is 9 to 12 years, with the same fine. The provision sets aggravating circumstances when the perpetrator holds the status of Altex, UAP, trusted user or operator, OEA or operator under a special regime, and greater punishment for repeat offenders. It also contains a rule that changes the decisions of anyone facing a seizure: under its paragraph, the legalization of the goods does not extinguish criminal action. In other words, regularizing the goods before the customs authority may help recover them, but it does not by itself close the criminal front.
Article 320, as amended by Article 6 of Law 1762 of 2015, punishes aiding and facilitating smuggling: possessing, holding, transporting, loading, unloading, storing, concealing, distributing or selling goods that were illegally brought in, concealed or removed from customs control, or brought into the primary zone without formalities. If the amount exceeds 50 and reaches up to 200 SMMLV, the prison term is 3 to 6 years; above 200 SMMLV, 6 to 10 years, and in both cases there is a fine of 200% to 300% of the customs value. The provision does not apply to the end consumer who holds an invoice or equivalent document meeting the requirements of Article 771-2 of the Tax Code. That difference matters because the warehouse keeper, carrier, trader or reseller can face Article 320 without having brought the goods in. In parallel runs the administrative regime: Law 2586 of 2026 governs customs infractions, seizure and forfeiture, which proceed only on the grounds set by law (see /decomiso-aprehension-dian), and the general customs service is at /aduanas. The administrative infraction is disputed before DIAN; the crime, before the prosecutor's office and the courts. One does not replace the other, and what is said on one front may appear on the other.