No universal or automatic dismissal exists: each tax offense has distinct statutory requirements subject to judicial verification. In withholding agent omission (Art. 402 Penal Code, amended by Law 1819 of 2016), preclusion or case dismissal applies upon extinguishing the tax obligation through effective payment or statutory compensation/offset of amounts due plus interest, without prejudice to administrative penalties; payment plans or guarantees do not extinguish the obligation or automatically close the case. In asset omission (Art. 434A) and tax evasion (Art. 434B), paragraph 1 safeguards genuine tax controversies: criminal prosecution proceeds only where no administrative appeals remain pending or where no reasonable legal interpretation exists, provided declared facts and figures are complete and truthful, subject to DIAN special committee referral. Under paragraph 2, criminal action is extinguished by payment of taxes, penalties, and interest up to two (2) times in total, jointly counting prior extinctions or principle of opportunity applications under either Article 434A or 434B; from the third instance, payment only allows up to half sentence reduction. Finally, tax payment does not extinguish independent autonomous crimes (such as document forgery, conspiracy, or money laundering), which are prosecuted and evaluated separately.