Criminal Tax Defense · Office of the Attorney General of Colombia

Preliminary criminal tax inquiry: what to do before formal indictment?
Know your statutory rights as a suspect, deploy forensic evidence, and halt charges with ex-DIAN attorneys and forensic accountants end-to-end.

When DIAN files a criminal referral or the Attorney General's Office (Fiscalía) opens a preliminary inquiry (indagación preliminar) for tax evasion (Art. 434B Penal Code), undisclosed assets (Art. 434A), or withholding tax omission (Art. 402), time is critical. The inquiry stage is where the prosecutor determines whether conduct constitutes a crime; this is where our team articulates legal strategy and forensic CPA reports to pursue early case dismissal (Art. 79 Law 906 of 2004) before any indictment. Ligal delivers direct, comprehensive criminal tax defense end-to-end with ex-DIAN attorneys and CPAs.

5.0 / 5 · 36 reviewsEx-DIANLaw 906 Art. 175 · Arts. 402, 434A, 434B Penal CodeComprehensive end-to-end criminal tax defense

Urgent criminal defense line on WhatsApp: +57 319 272 9164. Bogotá · Calle 99 7A-51, Suite 206. Immediate in-person and virtual consultation.

Preliminary inquiry stage under Colombian criminal procedural law

The decisive window prior to indictment: where defensive evidence is presented and case dismissal is achieved.

The preliminary inquiry (indagación preliminar) is the initial phase of the Colombian adversarial criminal system (Law 906 of 2004). It is triggered by the receipt of a criminal notice (noticia criminis)—typically an official complaint lodged by DIAN following a tax audit. The purpose is for the assigned prosecutor, supported by judicial police (CTI or SIJIN), to verify whether the alleged conduct occurred, whether it fits the statutory criminal definition, and whether there are grounds to formally bind an individual. At this stage, the subject holds the legal status of 'suspect' (indiciado) and has not been formally indicted.

Pursuant to paragraph 1 of Article 175 of Law 906 of 2004 (amended by Article 2 of Law 2205 of 2022), the Prosecutor has a statutory maximum of two (2) years from the complaint to either bring formal indictment charges or issue a reasoned order archiving the file (extended to three years in cases of multiple offenses or three or more co-suspects, and five years in specialized jurisdictions). The suspect enjoys fundamental constitutional protections: no duty to self-incriminate (Art. 282), the absolute right to remain silent, and full statutory authority for legal counsel to collect evidence, obtain independent forensic accounting opinions, and request case dismissal (Art. 79) by demonstrating lack of intent or legitimate statutory interpretation. Ligal handles your criminal and forensic tax defense directly end-to-end with our dedicated in-house team.

Statutory protections during preliminary inquiry

  • Art. 175 Law 906 timeline (Law 2205/2022): 2-year general limit to indict or order motivated case archive.
  • Suspect status (indiciado): clean criminal record preserved and no standard pre-trial detention.
  • Right against self-incrimination (Art. 282): no oath taken and defense attorney presence is legally mandatory.
  • Evidentiary defense powers (Arts. 267 & 268): right to gather accounting records and challenge DIAN claims directly.
  • Statutory payment extinction: payment extinguishes charges only where authorized (Arts. 402, 434A, 434B), with a 2-time combined limit across 434A/B.
  • No blanket dismissal for related crimes: paying DIAN does not extinguish separate forgery or conspiracy charges.
Request confidential diagnosis of criminal inquiry
Ligal criminal tax defense strategy

Immediate technical intervention from day one: criminal litigation and forensic accounting synchronized end-to-end.

We do not wait passively for formal indictment. We intervene during the inquiry phase to dismantle DIAN audit assumptions and achieve early termination.

01

Forensic analysis of the complaint and DIAN audit files

We scrutinize the criminal file, administrative tax assessments, and audit working papers sent to the prosecutor, identifying flaws in statutory element matching and purely technical tax interpretation disputes.

02

Administrative exhaustion and reasonable interpretation safeguards

We invoke statutory safe harbors under paragraph 1 of Arts. 434A and 434B of the Penal Code (Law 2277/2022), establishing whether tax appeals remain pending or whether operations reflected a reasonable interpretation of tax law.

03

Forensic accounting reports & evidentiary collection (Arts. 267 & 268)

Our in-house forensic CPAs reconstruct accounting ledgers, banking trails, and economic substance to disprove fraudulent intent, fictitious transactions, or willful asset concealment.

04

Preparation & legal counsel for suspect interrogation (Art. 282)

We structure the procedural interrogation strategy: invoking the right to remain silent or delivering an evidence-backed deposition, ensuring zero self-incrimination with our team by your side.

05

Formal motion for case dismissal and archival (Art. 79 Law 906)

We draft and submit reasoned motions demonstrating lack of criminal typicality, absence of tax harm, or legitimate economic justification to obtain an official archival order before court indictment.

06

Assessment of payment extinction and settlement mechanisms

When payment extinction is strategically advisable, we verify the client has not exhausted the two-instance statutory limit (par. 2 Arts. 434A & 434B) and ensure no autonomous charges remain unprotected.

End-to-end criminal defense

Criminal litigators and forensic accountants, with insider knowledge of DIAN enforcement.

In criminal tax matters, a criminal lawyer without accounting depth is blind, and an accountant without criminal trial skills is helpless. Ligal unites both disciplines.

Managing Director · Ex-DIAN

Juan Santiago Rodríguez Prieto

Tax attorney and former DIAN official. Thoroughly versed in the DIAN Criminal Referral Committee protocols and technical audit reports.

Senior criminal defense attorneys

Corporate Criminal Litigation Practice

Specialists in economic criminal law and procedural litigation under Law 906 of 2004, representing clients in guarantee court hearings and prosecutor meetings.

Forensic CPAs and tax auditors

Jeysson Pulido & LIGAL Auditores

Specialized in forensic accounting testimony, bank flow tracing, tax base reconciliation, and expert reports for criminal courts.

Our defense commitments

What we never do: honest legal counsel without deceptive assurances.

We never advise paying blindly without reviewing charges

Settling with DIAN without examining whether the prosecutor alleges separate offenses (forgery or conspiracy) can result in losing funds while criminal prosecution proceeds.

We never send clients to interrogations unprepared

A prosecutor interrogation is not an informal interview. We never allow a client to attend without rigorous preparation and direct in-person representation.

Direct end-to-end criminal and tax defense

At Ligal, we integrate criminal defense and forensic accounting audits through our own internal team of ex-DIAN lawyers and CPAs, ensuring strict attorney-client privilege and direct representation in every proceeding.

Absolute privilege

Criminal tax defense conducted under strict attorney-client privilege and technical precision.

A criminal summons does not equal a conviction or an indictment. The preliminary inquiry is the single most valuable procedural window to dismiss criminal allegations before they enter the public court docket.

Headquartered in Bogotá with direct representation across all criminal courts and prosecutor offices nationwide.

Direct and urgent contact

Juan Santiago Rodríguez Prieto

Director · Tax Attorney · Ex-DIAN

Learn about the director
Criminal defense roadmap

How we take charge of your active criminal inquiry.

We initiate with an urgent confidential review of the summons and prosecutorial file to secure your legal position.

  1. 01

    Immediate (within 24 business hours)

    Formal appearance & case file acquisition

    We enter a formal appearance as defense counsel of record and obtain full copies of the prosecutorial file and DIAN complaint.

  2. 02

    3 to 7 business days

    Forensic audit & evidentiary compilation

    Our CPAs assemble the forensic report and documentary defense evidence under Arts. 267 and 268 of Law 906.

  3. 03

    Complete criminal representation

    Filing motion for case dismissal and representation

    We petition the prosecutor for formal case archival based on statutory atypicality prior to any indictment scheduling.

Frequently asked questions

Key questions regarding preliminary inquiries for criminal tax offenses

A preliminary inquiry (indagación preliminar) is the initial investigatory phase where the Prosecutor investigates whether a DIAN complaint constitutes a statutory crime. The person holds the status of 'suspect' (indiciado) and has no criminal record. Formal indictment (audiencia de formulación de imputación) is a public court hearing before a Guarantee Judge where the Prosecutor formally charges the citizen as an 'indicted defendant' (imputado), tolling the statute of limitations and opening the formal trial track.

Under paragraph 1 of Article 175 of Law 906 of 2004 (amended by Article 2 of Law 2205 of 2022), the Prosecutor has a statutory maximum of two (2) years from receipt of the criminal notice to either file an indictment or issue a reasoned order archiving the case. This term extends to three (3) years if there is a concurrence of offenses or three or more co-suspects, and to five (5) years in specialized circuit jurisdictions. Furthermore, paragraph 3 of Article 175 sets forth statutory special rules whose applicability must be evaluated on a case-by-case basis, without presuming an automatic extension of all preliminary inquiry periods. Expiration of these terms does not grant automatic prescription or criminal immunity (Constitutional Court Ruling C-893 of 2012); it triggers the prosecutor's duty to issue a reasoned decision on dismissal (Art. 79) or indictment, and enables defense counsel to petition a Guarantee Judge to assert due process and judicial promptness.

Yes, the Prosecutor or judicial police (CTI) can summon you for a suspect interrogation (Art. 282 Law 906 of 2004). You are legally required to be accompanied by a criminal defense lawyer. Under the Constitution, you are not under oath, you cannot be forced to testify against yourself or immediate family, and you have the absolute right to remain silent. An interrogation conducted without counsel is legally void.

Yes. Articles 267 and 268 of Law 906 of 2004 empower suspects and their defense counsel to collect evidence, obtain forensic CPA reports, and petition the prosecutor to conduct specific investigatory acts. Submitting a rigorous forensic accounting opinion during the inquiry is often the single most effective way to prove absence of fraudulent intent and obtain an early case dismissal.

No universal or automatic dismissal exists: each tax offense has distinct statutory requirements subject to judicial verification. In withholding agent omission (Art. 402 Penal Code, amended by Law 1819 of 2016), preclusion or case dismissal applies upon extinguishing the tax obligation through effective payment or statutory compensation/offset of amounts due plus interest, without prejudice to administrative penalties; payment plans or guarantees do not extinguish the obligation or automatically close the case. In asset omission (Art. 434A) and tax evasion (Art. 434B), paragraph 1 safeguards genuine tax controversies: criminal prosecution proceeds only where no administrative appeals remain pending or where no reasonable legal interpretation exists, provided declared facts and figures are complete and truthful, subject to DIAN special committee referral. Under paragraph 2, criminal action is extinguished by payment of taxes, penalties, and interest up to two (2) times in total, jointly counting prior extinctions or principle of opportunity applications under either Article 434A or 434B; from the third instance, payment only allows up to half sentence reduction. Finally, tax payment does not extinguish independent autonomous crimes (such as document forgery, conspiracy, or money laundering), which are prosecuted and evaluated separately.

Being under preliminary inquiry is neither a conviction nor an automatic arrest warrant. Under Law 906 of 2004, deprivation of liberty and arrest warrants are restricted to statutory grounds (a reasoned written order issued by a Guarantee Judge upon motivated prosecutorial request under Art. 297, or narrow legal exceptions such as flagrante delicto). Securing any judicial warrant requires proving constitutional necessity before the court (demonstrated flight risk, evidence tampering, or danger to the community). Ligal's defense team evaluates the concrete case facts, audits the file, and demonstrates community ties and voluntary appearance before competent judicial authorities, without making ungrounded promises of automatic neutralization.

Immediate criminal defense

Protect your freedom and assets with ex-DIAN criminal defense lawyers.

If you received a summons from the Fiscalía, CTI, or notice of a DIAN complaint, contact us immediately. We evaluate your case under legal privilege.

Book appointment

Protected by legal professional privilege (Art. 74 Political Constitution of Colombia).

Diagnostic